Maybe you’ve heard a thing or two about Mali in the news recently. If not, here is a little bit about it to get you up to speed. Mali used to be a centre of African culture with a booming tourist trade and a tradition of great musicians. Unfortunately, since the 16th of January 2012, there has been a change in this great country. Islamist military groups extended their ever growing reach into this African nation and seized control of the northern portion of the country. The cities of Gao and Timbuktu were occupied in this insurgent push.
Jihadis held the whole north before France came in |
So eventually the Malian government asked for help, and France came to the rescue. They quickly pushed back Jihad in the North, but now they are engaged in an Afghanistan style war with a hidden enemy that uses child soldiers and suicide bombers to their advantage.
Now, I’m sure someone out there is thinking, “Well why can’t we just let a country do what it wants? Why do western nations always stick their nose into the business of other countries?”. Well if you take this viewpoint then please, tell me why. In my opinion the answer to this question is clear. Violent religious fundamentalists have absolutely no right to overthrow a vulnerable secular state and replace it with a cruel Islamic code of conduct known as Sharia Law
.
The islamists in northern Mali were implementing a strict form of Sharia Law. In doing so, they effectively banned alcohol, cigarettes, music, dancing, socialization, and books that are not the Quran. This form of theocratic government is the first step on the long road backwards for the rights of women, secular government, freedom of the individual, and quality of life in Mali. In the North, there were reports of inhumane applications of sharia law, such as amputation of fingers or hands as a punishment for theft.
I have to respect France for being the country to step up to the plate and help stop this menace. Even if all they manage to do is get engaged in a long bloody war, they proved that the western world would still respect democracy over theocracy. Theft should not result in amputation of the hand. Adultery should not result in public flogging. Leaving Islam is no justification for capital punishment.
Picture from Gao |
Though Mali and France seem like they’re so far and distant from us, the idea of Sharia Law is closer than you think. In Britain, Sharia is seen as a parallel legal system. Even here in Ontario, Muslim organizations attempted to get the provincial government to allow Sharia law as a parallel legal system. Luckily for us, then-Premier Dalton McGuinty answered their calls in no uncertain terms…
“There will be no sharia law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians.”